- Partners
- Contact Us
- Log in
Grasshopper vs eVoice: Which Business Phone System Should You Choose?

Key Highlights:
Grasshopper is stronger for simple small business calling, built-in texting, mobile app use, voicemail transcription, and account-based plans.
eVoice is stronger for users who want basic virtual phone service, auto-attendant, call routing, virtual fax, and per-user pricing.
eVoice uses per-user pricing and can become less attractive when a team needs add-ons such as call recording, unlimited messaging, live receptionist, or voicemail transcription.
Grasshopper has higher public G2 and Capterra ratings than eVoice.
Grasshopper and eVoice both help small businesses create a professional phone presence without buying desk phones or building a traditional PBX system. Grasshopper is better for entrepreneurs and small teams that want simple calling, texting, voicemail, extensions, and account-based pricing. eVoice is better for users who want low-entry per-user pricing, call routing, virtual fax, and basic phone features for US and Canada communication.
Choose Grasshopper if your team wants a cleaner small business phone app with built-in texting and shared-user flexibility. Choose eVoice if your business needs a simple virtual phone line with call handling, fax, voicemail, and a lower per-user entry cost.
Grasshopper vs eVoice: Quick Comparison
Grasshopper is the stronger choice for small teams that want a polished business phone app and built-in texting. eVoice is the simpler choice for users who mainly need virtual phone numbers, call routing and fax at a low starting price.
Category | Grasshopper | eVoice |
| Core use | Virtual phone system for small businesses, freelancers, and entrepreneurs. | Virtual phone system for small businesses and professionals that need basic call handling. |
| Ratings | G2: 3.9/5 Capterra: 4.3/5 | G2: 2.3/5 Capterra: 3.3/5 |
| Pricing |
|
|
| Pricing model | Account-based pricing with phone numbers, extensions, and user limits. | Per-user pricing with add-ons for some advanced needs. |
| Phone numbers | Local, toll-free, and vanity numbers in the US and Canada. | Local and toll-free numbers, with some international number support. |
| SMS/MMS | Business texting is included in plans. | SMS is available, but unlimited messaging may require a higher plan or add-on. |
| Call management | Call forwarding, extensions, custom greetings, voicemail, instant response, and simultaneous call handling. | Auto-attendant, call forwarding, business hours, custom ring styles, call queueing, and voicemail. |
| AI features | Limited compared with AI-focused phone systems. | Limited compared to modern AI phone systems. |
| Best fit | Small teams that want easy calling, texting, and shared phone access. | Solo users or small teams that want low-cost basic phone and fax features. |
| Main limitation | Not built for advanced sales, support, analytics, or deep workflow automation. | Many advanced features may require add-ons or plan upgrades. |
Grasshopper Overview
Grasshopper is a virtual phone system built for small businesses that want a professional number without a complex phone setup. It works well for freelancers, consultants, local service businesses, and small teams that want to answer business calls from mobile or desktop apps.
Grasshopper is stronger than eVoice when texting, and a user-friendly setup, and shared access matter. It also works well when a business wants one professional number with extensions instead of a full call center platform.
Key Features
- Local, toll-free, and vanity phone numbers
- Business texting
- Voicemail and voicemail transcription
- Custom greetings
- Call forwarding and call transfers
- Simultaneous call handling
- Instant response for missed calls
- Virtual fax
- Mobile and desktop apps
- Call reporting
Pricing
- True Solo: $18/month, or $14/month (when billed annually)
- Solo Plus: $32/month, or $25/month (when billed annually)
- Small Business: $92/month, or $80/month (when billed annually)
Pros and Cons
Pros Cons ✅ Easy setup for small businesses and solo users. ❌Limited CRM integrations compared with modern cloud phone systems. ✅ Built-in texting helps teams respond to missed calls and customer messages. ❌No native video meetings or team chat suite. ✅ Account-based pricing can help small teams avoid paying per user. ❌Limited AI call insights for teams that need call summaries, sentiment, or advanced reporting. ✅ Mobile and desktop apps make business calls easier to manage away from the office. ❌North America-focused phone number coverage can limit international teams. ✅ Virtual fax and voicemail transcription add value for professional services teams. ❌Advanced call center features are limited.
eVoice Overview
eVoice is a virtual phone system for small businesses and professionals that want basic call handling without a traditional office phone setup. It helps users route calls, use auto-attendant menus, manage voicemail, send faxes, and keep business calls separate from personal calls.
eVoice can work for solo users and small teams that value a low entry price and simple phone features. It becomes less appealing when a business needs stronger reviews, built-in team collaboration, CRM connections, AI reporting, or modern call center controls.
Key Features
- Auto-attendant
- Call forwarding
- Custom ring styles
- Business hours routing
- Call queueing
- Virtual fax
- Voicemail and voicemail notifications
- Usage reports
- Desktop and mobile access
- SMS on supported plans or add-ons
Pricing
- Elite: $14/user/month, or $12/user/month (when billed annually)
- Elite Plus: $21/user/month, or $19/user/month (when billed annually)
Pros and Cons
Pros Cons ✅ Low annual entry price for users who need basic phone service. ❌Lower public ratings than Grasshopper on both G2 and Capterra. ✅ Useful call routing, auto-attendant, and business hours features. ❌Some useful features may require add-ons or higher plans. ✅ Virtual fax is useful for professional services and administrative workflows. ❌Limited integrations compared with modern business communication platforms. ✅ Per-user pricing can work for solo users who need only one line. ❌No strong AI call insights for sales or support teams ✅ Call queueing and custom ring features offer more structure than a basic second-line app. ❌The interface and product depth can feel limited for growing teams.
Grasshopper vs eVoice Features
Grasshopper and eVoice offer similar basic features, but they differ in daily usability. Grasshopper feels better for small teams that use texting and mobile apps often, while eVoice offers useful basic routing and fax features for users with simple phone needs.
Feature | Grasshopper | eVoice |
| Business phone number | Yes | Yes |
| Local numbers | Yes | Yes |
| Toll-free numbers | Yes | Yes |
| Vanity numbers | Yes | Limited or plan-dependent |
| Business texting | Yes | Available on a supported plan or an add-on |
| MMS | Yes, in supported regions | Limited |
| Virtual fax | Yes | Yes |
| Voicemail transcription | Yes | Available with limits or add-ons |
| Call forwarding | Yes | Yes |
| Auto-attendant | Extension-based setup | Yes |
| Call queueing | Limited | Yes |
| Call recording | Available on higher plans or plan-dependent setup | Add-on or plan-dependent setup |
| CRM integrations | Limited | Very limited |
| AI call insights | Limited | Limited |
| Team collaboration | Shared access, but no full team chat suite | Limited |
| Best feature strength | Ease of use and texting | Basic routing and fax |
Grasshopper vs eVoice: Call Management
Both tools support call forwarding, voicemail, greetings, and basic routing. Grasshopper is easier for small teams that want simple extensions and mobile access, while eVoice gives more structure through auto-attendant, call queueing, and custom ring styles.
Grasshopper is better when the team wants a simple number that can forward calls to the right person. eVoice is better when the business needs basic routing rules and fax support, but does not need advanced call center controls.
Grasshopper vs eVoice: Texting and Fax
Grasshopper is stronger for texting because business texting is built into the small business phone experience. eVoice offers messaging, but some texting needs may require a supported plan or add-on, which makes the total cost harder to compare.
Both tools support virtual fax, which is useful for legal, finance, healthcare, real estate, and admin-heavy businesses.
Grasshopper vs eVoice: Reviews and Ratings
Grasshopper has stronger public ratings than eVoice on both G2 and Capterra.
Review Platform | Grasshopper | eVoice |
| G2 | 3.9/5 | 2.3/5 |
| Capterra | 4.3/5 | 3.3/5 |
Grasshopper vs eVoice: Customer Support
Good customer support is important as phone system problems can cost leads, appointments, and customer trust. Grasshopper has a stronger public review profile, while eVoice reviews show mixed feedback around reliability and support experience.
Small businesses should test support before committing. Ask the service provider how number porting works, how quickly support responds, whether messaging requires add-ons, and what happens if calls fail during business hours.
Grasshopper vs eVoice: Which One Should You Choose?
Grasshopper suits small businesses that need a simple phone system with texting, voicemail, extensions, and easy mobile access. eVoice is a good option for businesses looking for a low-entry phone line with basic routing, fax, and auto-attendant features.
Choose Grasshopper if:
- Your team wants built-in business texting.
- You want account-based pricing instead of paying for every user.
- Your business mainly serves customers in the US and Canada.
- You need a simple app for calls, texts, voicemail, and extensions.
- Your team wants stronger public ratings and a more polished small business phone experience.
Choose eVoice if:
- You are a solo user or a very small team with basic phone needs.
- Your business needs a virtual fax and simple call routing.
- You want a low annual entry price.
- Your call workflow does not require deep integrations or AI insights.
- Your team can manage add-ons carefully.
Conclusion
Grasshopper is better for small businesses that want simple calling, texting, voicemail, extensions, and account-based pricing. eVoice is better for users who need a low-entry virtual phone system with basic routing, virtual fax, and simple call handling.
The better choice depends on how your team communicates. Grasshopper makes more sense when texting and shared access matter. eVoice makes more sense when one user needs a simple phone and fax setup.
For growing teams that need deeper call records, AI insights, and better routing, Calilio is a stronger alternative to both Grasshopper and eVoice. It comes with advanced call management features, including call routing, voicemail, SMS, and AI call reports, at an affordable cost.
Summarize this blog with:
Frequently asked questions
Is eVoice cheaper than Grasshopper?
eVoice has a lower annual per-user entry price, while Grasshopper uses account-based pricing. Grasshopper can offer better value when several users share one business phone setup, but eVoice can cost less for one user with basic needs.
Does Grasshopper support call recording?
Which is better for small businesses, Grasshopper or eVoice?
What is a better alternative to Grasshopper and eVoice?

Still have questions?
Can’t find the answer you’re looking for? Please chat with our friendly team.
Stay in the loop
Get the latest call insights, trends, and updates delivered straight to your inbox.
By subscribing, you agree to receive updates from Calilio.
You can unsubscribe anytime.
Enter the World of AI Business Phone System with Calilio
Improve your business operation with Calilio's advanced virtual phone system. Join today for a better way to connect.
